Work-Life “balance” is a myth. That doesn’t mean you’re doomed.

Clarke McEwan Accountants



If you're striving for work-life balance, you'll never get it, argues Stewart Friedman, a noted author and adviser to global leaders who inspires "rock star adoration" among his students at Wharton.

Stewart Friedman advocates developing skills that integrate work with the rest of your life – home, community and the private self of mind, body and spirit – to emphasise overall harmony rather than trade-offs.

In an interview during his appearance at the World Business Forum in Sydney, he outlined these core skills and showed how integrating them can lead you to better performance in all parts of your life.

Work-life balance – that fraught division of time between work and family life – is the Holy Grail of the modern workplace. We're all looking for it, but so far no one has actually found it.

The work-life balance paradigm

According to the work-life balance paradigm, there's work and then there's life – everything else. Like oil and water, the two don't mix.

But what if work-life balance is an unattainable myth – an unhelpful binary that privileges one area of life – work – and pits it against all others – life?

Stewart D. Friedman, professor at the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, says the digital age's obsession with elusive work-life balance stems from both "the widespread feeling of being overwhelmed by the demands of everyday life and the increased interest in doing work that has meaningful social value."

Ironically, this frantic pursuit of a full life can leave us feeling stretched thin and unfulfilled. As we try to satisfy life's competing priorities, we often find no one wins.

Friedman, who has developed his theories of work-life integration over three decades of teaching, research and practice in the field, suggests that a better way of understanding what we mean by work-life balance is to view life as the sum of four major domains: work or study, home or family, community, and the private realm of mind, body, and spirit.

Trading balance for harmony

Friedman rejects the notion that success in one part of life, whether it is work or home, requires sacrifice in others – what he calls a "trade-off mindset".

"Our research at the Wharton School and elsewhere shows that it doesn't always have to be this way," he tells INTHEBLACK.

"Using different language to describe the relationship between work and the rest of life opens your mind to seeing and actually pursuing gains in all the different parts of life."

Harmony should be our goal, he says, not balance. The challenge lies in finding strategies and solutions that make life better in all domains – what Friedman labels "four-way wins".

This is not "having it all" – code for an impossibly high set of standards we impose on ourselves.

"You can't have it all – complete success in all the corners of your life, all at the same time. No one can," Friedman writes in Leading the Life You Want: Skills for Integrating Work and Life (Harvard Business Review Press, 2014).

"But even though it can seem impossible to bring these four domains into greater alignment, it doesn't have to be impossible. Conflict and stress aren't inevitable. Harmony is possible."

Skills and principles

In 1999, the CEO of Ford Motor Company recruited Friedman to create a program to help employees find better ways of integrating work with the rest of life. The result was Total Leadership, a program he subsequently developed into a course at Wharton and a book, Total Leadership: Be a Better Leader, Have a Richer Life (Harvard Business Review Press, 2008).

Three key principles underpin Friedman's theory of Total Leadership: to be real, to be whole, and to be innovative.

"To be real is to act with authenticity by clarifying what's important to you…To be whole is to act with integrity by recognizing how the different parts of your life affect each other. All this examination allows you to be innovative," he explains in Leading the Life You Want .

Success requires that you understand who and what is most important to you in the different parts of your life.

"Then you create new ideas for how to improve performance in all the different parts," he tells INTHEBLACK.

Leading by example

Friedman's research found that to increase performance in the different parts of their lives, the most effective leaders act with authenticity, integrity and creativity.

In Leading the Life You Want , Friedman offers six case studies of high-profile people who have successfully integrated work with the rest of life by demonstrating these values.

One example he gives is Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, who has a knack for "creating win-win solutions that meet multiple goals" – like turning the common problems faced by working mothers everywhere into an agenda-setting, bestseller book, Lean In .

But work-life integration is not restricted to the Sheryl Sandbergs of this world. According to Friedman's principles, anyone can achieve four-way wins.

Trial and error

Like any rigorous scientific method, Friedman's theory relies on experimentation.

His experiments are systematically planned and executed trials of minor changes to see how they affect the different areas of life. If something doesn't work, the experiment is adjusted or abandoned, and the failure notched up to experience.

"Little is lost," Friedman writes, while wins accrue to gradually improve life as a whole.

It's a system that is open to everyone.

"For decades I've been coaching people at all life stages and in countries around the world and I have never met a person who could not come up with a creative idea for experimenting in what I call 'the laboratory of your life' in the pursuit of four-way wins," he says.

"To do so is challenging, and fun."

Do your priorities match your efforts?

Try this test. Prioritise four areas – or domains – in your life and then examine how much focus and effort you're allocating to each (see example below). Are the two lists aligned?

This common lack of alignment is what often leaves us with a sense of imbalance or dissatisfaction. By realigning your focus and effort with your priorities, you can start to create greater harmony in your life.



This article was first published by INTHEBLACK.

By Clarke McEwan September 8, 2026
For many SMSF trustees, property is one of the most significant assets held by their SMSF. Unlike personally owned assets, there is a legal requirement that all SMSF assets are valued each 30 June. This can be a simple process for assets that have a ready market like listed shares, however the process for other assets like property can be more onerous. Trustees are responsible for determining the market value of fund assets. After your annual financial statements are prepared your fund auditor will need to see objective and supportable evidence that backs up how you have arrived at the market value. Trustees have the option to use a qualified independent valuer for this and should consider this where an asset represents a significant part of the fund’s value or might be difficult to value. Where trustees choose not to use an independent valuer, they will need to be able to support asset valuations with evidence from multiple sources. Typically, for property this may include: Recent comparable sales – Generally at least 3 and the properties should be genuinely comparable in terms of size and location. A real estate agent appraisal that also includes comparable sales. Net income yields for commercial property (generally not sufficient evidence on its own). The ATO includes some helpful guidance on this in their Guide to valuing SMSF assets. Where an SMSF holds property that meets the business real property (BRP) definition it is possible that this property can be leased to a business that is operated by a member or a related party of the SMSF. However, the fact that an arrangement like this is permitted does not mean the fund trustees can charge a non-market rate of rent. When a rental arrangement is entered into with a related party of the super fund, that arrangement should be on arm’s length (commercial) terms and this should be supported by a rental appraisal.  An easy way to think about this is – do all the lease terms reflect an arrangement that would be agreed to if the tenant was an unrelated third party? To evidence that a related party arrangement is on arm’s length (commercial) terms an auditor should be provided with; A properly documented lease; A rent appraisal when the lease was first entered into; Evidence that the arrangement is operating based on the terms of the lease; and Evidence that where a prior lease term has expired the terms have been reset to market value – backed up by a new rent appraisal. Although your financial year 2026 SMSF audit might not be taking place for some months, the process can be much smoother where SMSF trustees are proactive and start to compile this evidence in advance, rather than waiting for the auditor’s request.
By Clarke McEwan September 1, 2026
At the Federal Budget in May 2026, the Government announced that it would reintroduce a loss carry back tax offset for companies, providing a crucial buffer to any business facing difficult trading conditions.
By Clarke McEwan August 30, 2026
Tax Time 2026 is in full swing, and with that comes a decision for anyone who uses their car for work purposes: is it better to claim a deduction using the logbook or cents per kilometre method? When can I claim car expenses? Broadly, tax deductions for car expenses (i.e. the costs you incur to own and operate a car) are available where you use your car for work-related trips, such as for travel between workplaces or to perform your work duties. The exception is ordinary commuting to and from work - such expenses cannot typically be claimed, as they’re considered private expenses. Cents per kilometre method The cents per kilometre method allows you to claim a fixed rate for each work-related kilometre you travel, up to a maximum of 5,000 km each year. This fixed rate per km covers all of your car expenses for a year, including decline in value, registration and insurance, maintenance, repairs and fuel costs. For the 2025-26 tax year, the rate of deduction is 88 cents per kilometre, which means this tax time, the maximum potential amount of deduction is $4,400. (And keep in mind that the rate of deduction has been increased to 91 cents per km as of 1 July 2026, meaning a total potential deduction of $4,550 in the 2026-27 tax year). One of the benefits of using the cents per kilometre method is that it’s relatively simple, as you don’t need to keep receipts for your fuel or car expenses. However, you do need to keep records to show how you’ve calculated your work-related kilometres (for example, a diary), and you also need to be able to show that you own the car you’re using for work. Logbook method If you have a lot of work-related car expenses and have the time, you might find that the logbook method gives you the best deduction. The logbook method allows you to claim the work-related portion of your actual car expenses. This means that you can claim for a percentage of the actual expenses incurred on running costs such as fuel, electricity, servicing, registration, insurance and the decline in value, provided you’ve used the car in the course of your work. However, as the potential deductions under the logbook method are higher, there are stricter record-keeping requirements to meet. This includes keeping a logbook, which allows the calculation of how much you can claim back, it must: - cover at least 12 continuous weeks and be broadly representative of your travel, - include the reason and purpose, as well as the destination of every work-related journey, - the odometer reading at the start and end of each journey, - and the total kilometres travelled on the journey, - include odometer readings for the start and end of the logbook period and the total kilometres travelled during that period. Each journey in your logbook must be made at the end of the journey or as soon as possible afterwards. If you don't have a valid logbook, then unfortunately you cannot use the logbook method to claim car expenses, although the cents per km method may be available instead. Which is better? The answer to whether you should choose the logbook or cents per km method is very dependent on your personal situation. If you have light work-related car use and don’t love keeping extensive records, the cents per km method may be better suited to your needs, while those who use their car for work frequently may receive a higher deduction under the logbook method. If you’re unsure which method is best for you, speak to a member of our team today.
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
By Clarke McEwan August 19, 2026
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
By Clarke McEwan August 17, 2026
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care.
By Clarke McEwan August 11, 2026
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care. Strong financial management is essential for maintaining profitability, supporting growth, meeting compliance obligations, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the practice.
More Posts