A guide to developing a successful personal budget

Clarke McEwan Accountants

A good budget should be the foundation for achieving our financial goals. But all too often we abandon our budgets at the very first obstacle, meaning they're simply not worth the paper – or spreadsheet – they're written on.

So what makes it so hard to keep to a personal finance plan and how can you give yourself the best possible chance of succeeding?

THE PSYCHOLOGY BEHIND FAILED BUDGETS

According to psychologist Rachel Clements from the Centre for Corporate Health many people fail to stick to a budget from a deep-seeded belief that they simply don't deserve to achieve their financial goals rather than from a lack of planning or preparation.

"How often are we told that 'money doesn't grow on trees' or something similar, which suggests that finances should always be a struggle? That's the belief we can take with us into our savings plan," Clements says.

"But if your underlying beliefs are not aligned to your goal, it's not going to be achievable or sustainable no matter what you do," she says.

So Clements argues that the first step in any successful budgeting plan is to step back and look at our own attitudes to finances. In doing so, we need to accept that there is nothing wrong with managing your money successfully and that, by making the right decisions and showing a bit of discipline, we're worthy of reaching our financial goals too.

But if your underlying beliefs are not aligned to your goal, it's not going to be achievable or sustainable no matter what you do.

A MOVING OF THE MIND

Even once we've addressed our own attitudes to personal wealth, Clements says that sticking to a budget requires a conscious behavioural shift. In that sense, it's no different to having a plan for achieving any other goal.

But she says that getting the behavioural change that's needed to make a budget work requires consciously re-programming our minds about who we are and what we're like.

"We all have a comfort zone and when we leave it our body has a strong reaction and we want to be pulled back in," Clements explains. "Although this might sound strange, a lot of people are comfortable when they're not in control of their finances."

But convincing your mind that you're a different person isn't easy, especially if you try it all in one hit. For that reason, Clements suggests getting it use to the changing behavioural shift by starting with – and achieving – small goals along the way to achieving larger ones so that our mind sees that we're doing well.

"As humans, we like to get reinforcement that we're doing the right thing," Clements says. "It's like people who set out to lose 10 kilograms. It's so much easier when they weigh themselves at the end of each week to show they're heading in the right direction."

MAKING GOALS SPECIFIC AND MEANINGFUL

Speaking of which, Clements suggests that you will stick to a resolution of any kind more easily if you're working towards something tangible.

That means a key part of making any budget work is to tie your milestones to meaningful and specific financial goals. For instance, having a goal of saving $500 a month for a $6,000 holiday to Fiji in 12 months is more concrete and therefore more achievable than simply aiming to save $500 a month for a year – even though the two require exactly the same budgeting.

BE REALISTIC AND PRECISE

Another, more practical, reason budgets often fail has nothing to do with psychology and more to do with maths. Put simply, sometimes the data that goes into building them isn't right.

For instance, if you're budgeting for how much to spend on power, and you base your figures on last summer's bill when the heater never went on, you'll have a distorted view of how much you need to spend each quarter. To get an accurate record you really need to go back over at least 12 months' worth of bills.

Alternatively, budgets sometimes fail because we're simply too hard on ourselves. In fact, one study in the Journal of Consumer Psychology 1 found that our self-control can actually get worn out if we use it too much. We might be saving for a specific goal but we do need to have a little fun too. So make sure you factor in things such as holidays, eating out, movies and other entertainment too: or even better, tie these treats to your savings goals along the way.

It's also worth remembering that things rarely, if ever, go according to plan. For this reason, it's important to factor in a buffer that can be used for car or home repairs or for that large bill you didn't see coming.

CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITIES

At its heart a budget is all about living within your means to achieve your financial goals. And if you find your means are grander than you're allowing for – or if you want to save for something that you can't afford no matter how you play with the numbers – you really have two possibilities: scale back or bring in more money.

If you're not prepared or able to scale back, you'll need to look at ways to potentially create a second source of income away from your primary work: whether that's a new or second job, a business on the side or an income-producing investment.

AND REMEMBER…

Nobody is perfect. There will be times when we stray from our budget: whether that's because we get carried away on a night out with friends or buy something we probably shouldn't have.

So don't be too hard on yourself when you fall off the horse. After all, a dollar here or there won't cost you, so long as you don't do it too often. Just get back to your savings plan and start again while things are still salvageable.

YOUR BUDGETING CHECKLIST

If you're setting up your own budget, here are the questions you need to ask yourself first:

  1. What am I saving for?
  2. What milestones will I hit along the way?
  3. Is my data accurate?
  4. Have I factored in what will happen on a rainy day?
  5. Am I being too hard on myself?
  6. Will I bring in enough money to stick to this budget?
  7. What will I do if I stray from my goals?

And if you want to enlist some professional help, Clarke McEwan can assist you with a financial planner to help tailor a budget to you that will help you reach your financial goals.

By Clarke McEwan September 1, 2026
At the Federal Budget in May 2026, the Government announced that it would reintroduce a loss carry back tax offset for companies, providing a crucial buffer to any business facing difficult trading conditions.
By Clarke McEwan August 30, 2026
Tax Time 2026 is in full swing, and with that comes a decision for anyone who uses their car for work purposes: is it better to claim a deduction using the logbook or cents per kilometre method? When can I claim car expenses? Broadly, tax deductions for car expenses (i.e. the costs you incur to own and operate a car) are available where you use your car for work-related trips, such as for travel between workplaces or to perform your work duties. The exception is ordinary commuting to and from work - such expenses cannot typically be claimed, as they’re considered private expenses. Cents per kilometre method The cents per kilometre method allows you to claim a fixed rate for each work-related kilometre you travel, up to a maximum of 5,000 km each year. This fixed rate per km covers all of your car expenses for a year, including decline in value, registration and insurance, maintenance, repairs and fuel costs. For the 2025-26 tax year, the rate of deduction is 88 cents per kilometre, which means this tax time, the maximum potential amount of deduction is $4,400. (And keep in mind that the rate of deduction has been increased to 91 cents per km as of 1 July 2026, meaning a total potential deduction of $4,550 in the 2026-27 tax year). One of the benefits of using the cents per kilometre method is that it’s relatively simple, as you don’t need to keep receipts for your fuel or car expenses. However, you do need to keep records to show how you’ve calculated your work-related kilometres (for example, a diary), and you also need to be able to show that you own the car you’re using for work. Logbook method If you have a lot of work-related car expenses and have the time, you might find that the logbook method gives you the best deduction. The logbook method allows you to claim the work-related portion of your actual car expenses. This means that you can claim for a percentage of the actual expenses incurred on running costs such as fuel, electricity, servicing, registration, insurance and the decline in value, provided you’ve used the car in the course of your work. However, as the potential deductions under the logbook method are higher, there are stricter record-keeping requirements to meet. This includes keeping a logbook, which allows the calculation of how much you can claim back, it must: - cover at least 12 continuous weeks and be broadly representative of your travel, - include the reason and purpose, as well as the destination of every work-related journey, - the odometer reading at the start and end of each journey, - and the total kilometres travelled on the journey, - include odometer readings for the start and end of the logbook period and the total kilometres travelled during that period. Each journey in your logbook must be made at the end of the journey or as soon as possible afterwards. If you don't have a valid logbook, then unfortunately you cannot use the logbook method to claim car expenses, although the cents per km method may be available instead. Which is better? The answer to whether you should choose the logbook or cents per km method is very dependent on your personal situation. If you have light work-related car use and don’t love keeping extensive records, the cents per km method may be better suited to your needs, while those who use their car for work frequently may receive a higher deduction under the logbook method. If you’re unsure which method is best for you, speak to a member of our team today.
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
By Clarke McEwan August 19, 2026
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
By Clarke McEwan August 17, 2026
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care.
By Clarke McEwan August 11, 2026
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care. Strong financial management is essential for maintaining profitability, supporting growth, meeting compliance obligations, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the practice.
By Clarke McEwan August 10, 2026
To ensure passage of the negative gearing and CGT discount changes that were announced in the May 2026 Federal Budget the Government agreed to make amendments to the SMSF borrowing rules. SMSFs are able to borrow in restricted circumstances which includes borrowing under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) to purchase a single acquirable asset. While there have previously been no specific legislative restrictions on the type of asset a SMSF can borrow to purchase, most commonly we see LRBAs being used to purchase property. Up until this point, this could have been any type of real property. These amendments will mean that when SMSF trustees wish to borrow to purchase a property, it must meet the business real property (BRP) definition. This BRP definition relates to usage of the property rather than zoning or what the property was originally built for. This change became law on 26 June 2026, but the Bill includes a 45 day transitional period which will finish on 10 August 2026. This transitional period may allow for arrangements that are currently being implemented on non-BRP assets to be allowable under the new rules where settlement occurs after 10 August 2026, provided the arrangement to purchase the property was entered into on or before 10 August 2026. We recommend that SMSF trustees who are currently implementing LRBA arrangements on non-BRP assets seek specialist SMSF legal advice to ensure their arrangements meet these transitional rules. While this change has been referred to in the media as a ban on super funds borrowing to purchase residential property, the use of the BRP definition makes the change slightly more complex than this. As this definition relates to usage of the property, it is possible that some residentially designed properties could meet the BRP definition (for example, a medical practice that operates from a residentially designed terrace dwelling). The BRP definition also requires that the property is wholly and exclusively used for business purposes. This could mean that some properties that may initially appear to be commercial in nature may not meet the BRP definition (for example, a mixed use residential and retail property on a single title). We recommend that SMSF trustees entering into new LRBAs seek advice from specialist legal and financial advisers to ensure the new requirements are met. Existing arrangements The updated rules allow for existing LRBAs over non-BRP assets to continue. They also allow for existing arrangements to be refinanced, subject to lender availability and approval. For any further information please contact our office.
More Posts