Election results are in, what’s next for tax?

Clarke McEwan Accountants

The Australian Labor Party (ALP) has won the 2022 Australian federal election and has been elected to form government in the House of Representatives. It is unclear at the time of writing whether the ALP will have a majority in the lower house.



In the Senate, the ALP will not have a straight majority and will likely have to work with the Crossbench in order to pass legislation.This article discusses tax changes that we may expect to see in the near future. It also considers the future of key tax changes previously proposed by the Coalition.


Election promises


In the leadup to the election, Labor had proposed the following tax measures if elected:

  • providing an FBT exemption for electric cars provided by an employer below the luxury car threshold from 1 July 2022
  • limiting debt deductions by multinationals to 30% of profits from 1 July 2023
  • limiting the ability of large multinationals to abuse Australia’s tax treaties while holding intellectual property in tax havens from 1 July 2023
  • implementing the OECD’s Two-Pillar solution for a global 15% minimum tax
  • reforming the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility Schemes, including changes that would see the government meeting upfront travel costs over $300 from January 2023.


These measures will not be effective until enacted by the incoming government.


Bills lapsed when the election was called


Measures contained in Bills that lapsed upon the proroguing of parliament will now be subject to consideration of the incoming government.


Key tax changes proposed in lapsed Bills related to:


  • Work-related self-education expenses: removing the $250 non-deductible threshold from the 2022–23 income year.
  • Electronic platform operators: requiring operators to provide transactions information to the ATO. In a Senate Committee report on the Bill, Labor had supported the amendments but highlighted that the proposed changes burdened workers rather than multinational technology companies.
  • Effective life of intangible assets: allowing taxpayers the choice to self-assess the effective life of certain intangible assets that start to be held on or after 1 July 2023. When introduced in 2022, Labor stated it would not oppose the measure. However, Labor had previously opposed similar amendments proposed by the Coalition government in 2017 from the Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Enterprise Incentives No 1) Bill 2017. The amendments in that Bill were ultimately removed.
  • Recovery grants for Cyclone Seroja: making eligible grants non-assessable and non-exempt income.
  • Labour mobility schemes: changes to effective tax rate on certain income earned by workers participating in the Australian Agriculture Worker Program or the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility scheme.
  • Patent box regime: providing concessional tax treatment for eligible income from exploiting a medical or biotechnology patent, to apply to patents issued after 11 May 2021 in respect of income years starting on or after 1 July 2022.


Tax changes proposed in the Federal Budget


Labor has previously indicated that it would seek to issue its own budget by the time of the usual mid-year fiscal and economy update in December. These measures were not introduced into parliament, and it is unknown at this stage whether the Labor government will proceed or make significant modifications. Key tax measures in the Coalition government’s 2022–23 Budget included:


  • temporary increased 20% deduction for small business external training expenditure from 7:30pm 29 March 2022 (Budget night) until 30 June 2024
  • temporary increased 20% deduction for small business expenditure supporting digital adoption from 7:30pm 29 March 2022 (Budget night) until 30 June 2023
  • concessional tax treatment for primary producers selling Australian Carbon Credit Units from 1 July 2022
  • expansion of patent box concession to include agricultural and low emissions innovation from 1 July 2023.


Other pending measures


The jury is still out on the future of tax changes announced by the previous government, particularly the following measures with a rapidly approaching start date:


  • Digital games tax offset: 30% refundable tax offset for qualifying Australian development expenditure on eligible games, due to commence from 1 July 2022.
  • Car parking fringe benefits: modifications to the definition of “commercial parking station” to better reflect the policy intention for car parking fringe benefits, for benefits provided from 1 April 2022.
  • Downsizer superannuation contributions: expanding eligibility to make downsizer contributions to individuals aged over 55 from 1 July 2022. As currently legislated, the eligibility age will reduce from 65 to 60 years of age from 1 July 2022.


Other longstanding tax proposals that we may see the incoming government address include:


  • Reforms to tax residency. The previous government had announced changes relevant to individuals, SMSFs and foreign incorporated companies.
  • Debt and equity rules. Amendments to clarify the scope of an integrity provision was first announced in a 2011–12 Labor Budget announcement. Draft legislation based on the Board of Taxation’s recommendations from their review of the debt-equity provisions were released for consultation in 2016 by the previous government.
  • Division 7A. Targeted amendments to improve the operation and administration of Div 7A were first announced in the 2016–17 Budget. Further proposed changes for unpaid present entitlements to come within the scope of Div 7A were announced in the 2018–19 Budget.
  • Not-for-profits. The Labor government had previously introduced amendments to standardise the term “not-for-profit” by replacing defined and undefined uses of “non-profit” throughout tax legislation in a lapsed 2012 Bill. The previous government had also proposed changes to the administration of deductible gift recipients and the introduction of a deductible gift recipient category for pastoral care in schools.


Over the next few months, we will follow the progress on these measures once they have been considered by the incoming government.


However, if you wish to speak with us specifically about one or more of the items listed above, please do not hesitate to contact us so that we can keep you fully informed as soon as we become aware of any new information.



By Clarke McEwan September 1, 2026
At the Federal Budget in May 2026, the Government announced that it would reintroduce a loss carry back tax offset for companies, providing a crucial buffer to any business facing difficult trading conditions.
By Clarke McEwan August 30, 2026
Tax Time 2026 is in full swing, and with that comes a decision for anyone who uses their car for work purposes: is it better to claim a deduction using the logbook or cents per kilometre method? When can I claim car expenses? Broadly, tax deductions for car expenses (i.e. the costs you incur to own and operate a car) are available where you use your car for work-related trips, such as for travel between workplaces or to perform your work duties. The exception is ordinary commuting to and from work - such expenses cannot typically be claimed, as they’re considered private expenses. Cents per kilometre method The cents per kilometre method allows you to claim a fixed rate for each work-related kilometre you travel, up to a maximum of 5,000 km each year. This fixed rate per km covers all of your car expenses for a year, including decline in value, registration and insurance, maintenance, repairs and fuel costs. For the 2025-26 tax year, the rate of deduction is 88 cents per kilometre, which means this tax time, the maximum potential amount of deduction is $4,400. (And keep in mind that the rate of deduction has been increased to 91 cents per km as of 1 July 2026, meaning a total potential deduction of $4,550 in the 2026-27 tax year). One of the benefits of using the cents per kilometre method is that it’s relatively simple, as you don’t need to keep receipts for your fuel or car expenses. However, you do need to keep records to show how you’ve calculated your work-related kilometres (for example, a diary), and you also need to be able to show that you own the car you’re using for work. Logbook method If you have a lot of work-related car expenses and have the time, you might find that the logbook method gives you the best deduction. The logbook method allows you to claim the work-related portion of your actual car expenses. This means that you can claim for a percentage of the actual expenses incurred on running costs such as fuel, electricity, servicing, registration, insurance and the decline in value, provided you’ve used the car in the course of your work. However, as the potential deductions under the logbook method are higher, there are stricter record-keeping requirements to meet. This includes keeping a logbook, which allows the calculation of how much you can claim back, it must: - cover at least 12 continuous weeks and be broadly representative of your travel, - include the reason and purpose, as well as the destination of every work-related journey, - the odometer reading at the start and end of each journey, - and the total kilometres travelled on the journey, - include odometer readings for the start and end of the logbook period and the total kilometres travelled during that period. Each journey in your logbook must be made at the end of the journey or as soon as possible afterwards. If you don't have a valid logbook, then unfortunately you cannot use the logbook method to claim car expenses, although the cents per km method may be available instead. Which is better? The answer to whether you should choose the logbook or cents per km method is very dependent on your personal situation. If you have light work-related car use and don’t love keeping extensive records, the cents per km method may be better suited to your needs, while those who use their car for work frequently may receive a higher deduction under the logbook method. If you’re unsure which method is best for you, speak to a member of our team today.
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
By Clarke McEwan August 19, 2026
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
By Clarke McEwan August 17, 2026
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care.
By Clarke McEwan August 11, 2026
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care. Strong financial management is essential for maintaining profitability, supporting growth, meeting compliance obligations, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the practice.
By Clarke McEwan August 10, 2026
To ensure passage of the negative gearing and CGT discount changes that were announced in the May 2026 Federal Budget the Government agreed to make amendments to the SMSF borrowing rules. SMSFs are able to borrow in restricted circumstances which includes borrowing under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) to purchase a single acquirable asset. While there have previously been no specific legislative restrictions on the type of asset a SMSF can borrow to purchase, most commonly we see LRBAs being used to purchase property. Up until this point, this could have been any type of real property. These amendments will mean that when SMSF trustees wish to borrow to purchase a property, it must meet the business real property (BRP) definition. This BRP definition relates to usage of the property rather than zoning or what the property was originally built for. This change became law on 26 June 2026, but the Bill includes a 45 day transitional period which will finish on 10 August 2026. This transitional period may allow for arrangements that are currently being implemented on non-BRP assets to be allowable under the new rules where settlement occurs after 10 August 2026, provided the arrangement to purchase the property was entered into on or before 10 August 2026. We recommend that SMSF trustees who are currently implementing LRBA arrangements on non-BRP assets seek specialist SMSF legal advice to ensure their arrangements meet these transitional rules. While this change has been referred to in the media as a ban on super funds borrowing to purchase residential property, the use of the BRP definition makes the change slightly more complex than this. As this definition relates to usage of the property, it is possible that some residentially designed properties could meet the BRP definition (for example, a medical practice that operates from a residentially designed terrace dwelling). The BRP definition also requires that the property is wholly and exclusively used for business purposes. This could mean that some properties that may initially appear to be commercial in nature may not meet the BRP definition (for example, a mixed use residential and retail property on a single title). We recommend that SMSF trustees entering into new LRBAs seek advice from specialist legal and financial advisers to ensure the new requirements are met. Existing arrangements The updated rules allow for existing LRBAs over non-BRP assets to continue. They also allow for existing arrangements to be refinanced, subject to lender availability and approval. For any further information please contact our office.
More Posts